| UNAVCO
 


Knowledge Base

GNSS Antenna Signal to Noise Comparison

This article presents a comparison of measured signal to noise ratio (SNR) values observed from several  GNSS antenna types. The results presented below were collected using a monument located on the UNAVCO Facility Roof in Boulder, CO. Each test antenna was installed on the test monument for approximately one week. 

Utilizing the same monument for the duration of the experiment reduces the error contribution from near-field and far-field site dependent effects. To reduce the impact of ionospheric and troposheric effects we computed four day averages of SNR in 5 degree elevation bins for each antenna type.

The same receiver was used throughout the experiment. Signal to noise observables obtained from different receiver types can vary significantly. Receiver manufactures apply different algorithims to obtain the S1 and S2 observables reported in the RINEX format.

GPS S1 and S2 observables were analyzed. GLONASS S1 observables were also evaluated.


Experiment Location: UNAVCO Facility Roof

Antenna List:
  1. LEIAR20
  2. SEPCHOKE_MC
  3. TPSCR.G3
  4. TPSPG_A1+GP
  5. TRM41249.00 
  6. TRM57971.00
  7. TRM59800.00
  8. TRM59900.00
Note: Antenna radomes were not used in this experiment.

Test Receiver Model:
  • Trimble NetR8
  • 24hr, 30sec sessions

Results

GPS L1 SNR Averages
Figure 1. Computed four day averages of S1 in 5 degree elevation bins for each antenna type. (full size)

GPS L2 SNR
Figure 2. Computed four day averages of S2 in 5 degree elevation bins for each antenna type. (full size)
glonass_l1_snr.jpg
Figure 3. Computed four day averages of GLONASS S1 in 5 degree elevation bins for each antenna type. (full size)


Antenna Model Antenna Make SNR Figures
LEIAR20 Leica figure
SEPCHOKE_MC Septentrio figure
TPSCR.G3 Topcon figure
TPSPG_A1+GP Topcon figure
TRM41249.00 Trimble figure
TRM57971.00 Trimble figure
TRM59800.00 Trimble figure
TRM59900.00 Trimble figure

Table 1. Individual figures showing SNR vs. elevation angle for all PRN's. The computed average and the standard deviation for each 5 degree elevation bin is also displayed. 

Questions or Comments? Please contact Henry Berglund; email: berglund @ unavco.org

Attached Files (13)
Comments
There are no comments for this article. Be the first to post a comment.
Name
Email
Security Code Security Code
Related Articles RSS Feed
UNAVCO testing of the SCIGN radome (2001)
Viewed 3689 times since Wed, Mar 24, 2010
1995 UNAVCO Antenna Height Tests
Viewed 2347 times since Wed, Mar 24, 2010
GNSS Antenna Sensitivity to Site Dependent Error Sources
Viewed 84718 times since Thu, Jan 31, 2013
Trimble TRM59900 Ti-Choke Ring GNSS Antenna Test Report
Viewed 6594 times since Wed, Oct 2, 2013
Iridium & GPS/GNSS Inteference from Iridium Data Transmitters
Viewed 18449 times since Mon, Oct 24, 2011
Preliminary Report on Data Quality with a Trimble 5700 GPS Receiver and an Ashtech Choke Ring Antenna (2002)
Viewed 4023 times since Wed, Dec 3, 2008
Assessing the Impact of the SCIGN Radome on Geodetic Parameter Estimates (paper, 2007)
Viewed 3462 times since Wed, Mar 24, 2010
Trimble Choke Ring Antenna Mean Phase Center Calibration (1996)
Viewed 5185 times since Fri, Oct 31, 2008
Antenna Swap with SCIGN Mount
Viewed 767 times since Tue, Mar 24, 2015
Ashtech and Trimble Choke Ring SNR Analysis (2001)
Viewed 7443 times since Wed, Mar 24, 2010
MENU

Last modified: Monday, 12-May-2014 00:18:29 UTC